tld.report · La ronde 2026

Instantané du 8 octobre 2026 · ICANN APS, champs publics

Candidatures / .aid / NA2631T-T48475 · publié par l'ICANN le 7 octobre 2026 · instantané du 2026-10-08

.aid

StandardActive

Registry Services, LLC, US Q1·Q25

Contrôle ultime déclaré : GoDaddy Inc. Q108 · Fiche ICANN ↗

Opérateur de registre, bureau d'enregistrement ou affilié existant, tel que déclaré : Q12

1. Existing Registry Operator and Affiliate of Registrars 2. Affiliated Registrars: GoDaddy.com, LLC (IANA 146) Bombora Technologies Pty Ltd (IANA 353) Wild West Domains, LLC (IANA 440) Blue Razor Domains, LLC (IANA 612) Go China Domains, LLC (IANA 1149) Go Canada Domains, LLC (IANA 1150) Go Australia Domains, LLC (IANA 1151) Go Montenegro Domains, LLC (IANA 1152) Go France Domains, LLC (IANA 1153) Mesh Digital Limited (IANA 1390) 123-Reg Limited (IANA 1515) GoDaddy Online Services Cayman Islands Ltd (IANA 1659) GoDaddy Corporate Domains, LLC (IANA 3786)

§ 1 — Sens de la chaîne Q118·Q120

"Aid" means help, assistance, or support given to those in need, including material relief, financial resources, or practical service provided to people, communities, or causes.

/eɪd/

§ 2 — Mission et objet Q133

1. Mission and Purpose of the Applied-for gTLD .aid gives organizations whose core work is helping others a naming layer that says exactly what they do at first glance. A web address ending in .aid signals relief, generosity, and support before a visitor reads a single word of content, which matters when trust and clarity decide whether someone donates, volunteers, or seeks help. A disaster-response group can stand up a campaign address that is short and easy to share across appeals. A mutual-aid network can claim a name that reflects its purpose without competing for crowded generic real estate. A foundation can separate its grant programs under memorable, self-explanatory addresses. In each case, the domain works as both a destination and a statement of mission. .aid is positioned as a digital identity layer for the assistance economy, not as a tool or service that performs relief work itself. It helps organizations create a recognizable presence, makes giving and receiving channels easier to find, and lets coalitions of partners gather around a shared and instantly understood idea. The purpose is to make help easier to locate, easier to trust, and easier to act on, turning a name into a clear invitation to support a cause.

Intended Registrants: Humanitarian organizations, nonprofits, relief agencies, charitable foundations, disaster-response groups, mutual-aid networks, grant-making bodies, and social enterprises that mobilize or distribute assistance.

Related Activities Supporting the Purpose: • Awareness-building campaigns timed to relief appeals and giving seasons • Registrar distribution to reach nonprofit and humanitarian segments • Registrant education on building clear, recognizable web addresses • Community outreach to relief networks, foundations, and grant bodies • Responsible registry operations consistent with general policy

2. Sustainability of the Purpose Over Time The enduring relevance of .aid rests on the economics of assistance: the continuous flow of money, goods, and services from those who can give to those who need. This is not a passing trend. Global giving, philanthropy, disaster relief, and humanitarian funding form a durable and structured economic sector with established donors, grant cycles, regulatory frameworks, and professional institutions. Resources are raised, allocated, and accounted for year after year, regardless of which platforms or technologies carry the transactions. Demand for assistance is structurally persistent. Crises, whether sudden or chronic, generate recurring funding appeals, and the institutions built to respond to them are permanent fixtures of civil society and government policy. As long as wealth is unevenly distributed and shocks occur, capital will move toward relief, and the organizations that direct that capital will need clear ways to be found, understood, and trusted. What makes .aid specifically durable is that "aid" names an economic function, not a method. The channels evolve, but the underlying activity (mobilizing resources to meet need) remains constant. A relief agency in any decade still must attract donors, distribute funds, coordinate partners, and report on impact. Each of those activities benefits from an unambiguous identity that communicates purpose at the point of contact. The string also carries built-in defensibility within a registry portfolio. It is narrow enough to belong to the assistance and giving sector rather than blending into broad community or charity naming, yet broad enough to span emergency relief, development funding, mutual aid, and grant-making. That focus keeps it relevant as new forms of giving emerge, from local solidarity networks to large institutional funding, without diluting its meaning. The value of .aid is anchored to the lasting economics of generosity and relief rather than to any single technology, it remains meaningful even if the way people transact, communicate, or organize changes substantially.

§ 3 — Engagements et sauvegardes Q164–Q188

Confiance accrue, risque pour le consommateur, secteur réglementé, déclarations à l'État, préjudice, fonction régalienne Q164–Q169Oui à : confiance accrue (Q164)
PIC de sauvegarde volontaires Q170·Q171

• Registry Operators will include a provision in their Registry-Registrar Agreements that requires Registrars to include in their Registration Agreements a provision requiring registrants to comply with all applicable laws, including those that relate to privacy, data collection, consumer protection (including in relation to misleading and deceptive conduct), fair lending, debt collection, organic farming, disclosure of data, and financial disclosures. • Registry Operators will include a provision in their Registry-Registrar Agreements that requires registrars at the time of registration to notify registrants of the requirement to comply with all applicable laws. • Registry Operators will include a provision in their Registry-Registrar Agreements that requires Registrars to include in their Registration Agreements a provision requiring that registrants who collect and maintain sensitive health and financial data implement reasonable and appropriate security measures commensurate with the offering of those services, as defined by applicable law.

Registry Voluntary Commitments Q172·Q173Aucun · 5 en proposent
Exemption du Code de conduite demandée Q185·Q188Non

§ 4 — Toutes les autres réponses publiées

Toutes les autres réponses que l'ICANN a publiées pour cette candidature, dans l'ordre du formulaire. Les coordonnées (Q17–Q24) sont laissées à la fiche ICANN.

Q199Q2.2-1 - Provide the applying entity’s self-certification document, signed by the CEO, President, CFO, and/or equivalent officer of the applying entity. If financial statements are provided by a Qualified Parent Entity (QPE) of the applying entity, the CEO, President, CFO, and/or equivalent officer of the QPE must co-sign the certification document. The self-certification document must represent and warrant: SC2.2-1.1 - As of the submission date of the application, the applying entity is a current registry operator or an affiliated entity of a current registry operator with one or more active Registry Agreements (RA). SC2.2-1.2 - The applying entity and/or a QPE will fund the startup and long-term operation of all of the applying entity’s current gTLDs and applied-for gTLD strings. SC2.2-1.3 - The applying entity and/or its officers are bound by law in its jurisdiction to represent financial statements accurately and the applying entity is in good standing in that jurisdiction.

Q2.2-1 - Provide the applying entity’s self-certification document, signed by the CEO, President, CFO, and/or equivalent officer of the applying entity. If financial statements are provided by a Qualified Parent Entity (QPE) of the applying entity, the CEO, President, CFO, and/or equivalent officer of the QPE must co-sign the certification document. The self-certification document must represent and warrant: SC2.2-1.1 - As of the submission date of the application, the applying entity is a current registry operator or an affiliated entity of a current registry operator with one or more active Registry Agreements (RA). SC2.2-1.2 - The applying entity and/or a QPE will fund the startup and long-term operation of all of the applying entity’s current gTLDs and applied-for gTLD strings. SC2.2-1.3 - The applying entity and/or its officers are bound by law in its jurisdiction to represent financial statements accurately and the applying entity is in good standing in that jurisdiction.

Réponse fournie sous forme de document. L'ICANN ne publie pas les pièces jointes.

Q200Q2.3-1 - Provide a document with a list of all of the applying entity’s current gTLDs and a list of all gTLDs for entities affiliated with the applying entity (if applicable).

Q2.3-1 - Provide a document with a list of all of the applying entity’s current gTLDs and a list of all gTLDs for entities affiliated with the applying entity (if applicable).

Réponse fournie sous forme de document. L'ICANN ne publie pas les pièces jointes.

Q220Q5.1-1 - Provide the applying entity’s self-certification document, signed by the CEO, President, CFO and/or equivalent officer of the applying entity. The self-certification document must represent and warrant: SC5.1-1.1 - The applying entity will appropriately protect confidentiality of data and prevent unauthorized access to data and services. SC5.1-1.2 - The applying entity will maintain a mature, appropriately funded and staffed security program, following a recognized, modern security framework based on risk management (such as the ISO27000 series, COBIT, HITRUST CSF, legally required security frameworks, or equivalent). The security program must be in place prior to delegation, and exist through at least the period of the registry agreement. SC5.1-1.3 - The applying entity is aware of and has designed its systems and business to comply with the relevant privacy and security regulations for all countries in which it operates.

Q5.1-1 - Provide the applying entity’s self-certification document, signed by the CEO, President, CFO and/or equivalent officer of the applying entity. The self-certification document must represent and warrant: SC5.1-1.1 - The applying entity will appropriately protect confidentiality of data and prevent unauthorized access to data and services. SC5.1-1.2 - The applying entity will maintain a mature, appropriately funded and staffed security program, following a recognized, modern security framework based on risk management (such as the ISO27000 series, COBIT, HITRUST CSF, legally required security frameworks, or equivalent). The security program must be in place prior to delegation, and exist through at least the period of the registry agreement. SC5.1-1.3 - The applying entity is aware of and has designed its systems and business to comply with the relevant privacy and security regulations for all countries in which it operates.

Réponse fournie sous forme de document. L'ICANN ne publie pas les pièces jointes.

Q221Q5.2-1 - Provide the applying entity’s self-certification document, signed by the CEO, President, CFO and/or equivalent officer of the applying entity. The self-certification document must represent and warrant: SC5.2-1.1 - The applying entity will, no later than delegation of the Top Level Domain (TLD), establish a dedicated abuse point of contact responsible for addressing matters requiring expedited attention and providing a timely response to abuse complaints concerning any name registered in the TLD. SC5.2-1.2 - The applying entity will, no later than delegation of the TLD, establish, publish, and provide to ICANN the location of a mechanism for members of the public to submit reports of abuse in accordance with the current obligations of the Base RA and any Consensus Policies. SC5.2-1.3 - The applying entity has developed proposed measures for removal of orphan glue records for names removed from the zone when provided with evidence in written form that the glue is present in connection with malicious conduct (see Specification 6). SC5.2-1.4 - The applying entity has or will have at time of delegation, established policies for handling complaints regarding abuse. Such policies are to be maintained and posted publicly so that anyone can review the policies via the Internet and any other means deemed appropriate by the applying entity. The applying entity’s policies at a minimum should contain appropriate confirmation of the receipt of the abuse report, the process of review of the report, and actions that will be taken if the applying entity confirms the report is legitimate. SC5.2-1.5 - The applying entity understands that DNS Abuse is Phishing, Malware, Botnets, Pharming and Spam (when used to deliver other forms of DNS Abuse). The applying entity understands and is prepared to contribute to the mitigation or disruption of DNS Abuse in domains in the TLD zone. SC5.2-1.6 - The applying entity’s abuse response capabilities are resourced appropriately to ensure a timely and adequate investigation and response to reports of DNS Abuse. This includes capabilities to receive and evaluate evidence of DNS Abuse in reports, and to take action to stop or disrupt the DNS Abuse. SC5.2-1.7 - The applying entity is prepared to conduct periodic scans of its zone to identify if domains are being used to perpetrate DNS Abuse, and to maintain statistical reports of the scans, the findings, and actions taken.

Q5.2-1 - Provide the applying entity’s self-certification document, signed by the CEO, President, CFO and/or equivalent officer of the applying entity. The self-certification document must represent and warrant: SC5.2-1.1 - The applying entity will, no later than delegation of the Top Level Domain (TLD), establish a dedicated abuse point of contact responsible for addressing matters requiring expedited attention and providing a timely response to abuse complaints concerning any name registered in the TLD. SC5.2-1.2 - The applying entity will, no later than delegation of the TLD, establish, publish, and provide to ICANN the location of a mechanism for members of the public to submit reports of abuse in accordance with the current obligations of the Base RA and any Consensus Policies. SC5.2-1.3 - The applying entity has developed proposed measures for removal of orphan glue records for names removed from the zone when provided with evidence in written form that the glue is present in connection with malicious conduct (see Specification 6). SC5.2-1.4 - The applying entity has or will have at time of delegation, established policies for handling complaints regarding abuse. Such policies are to be maintained and posted publicly so that anyone can review the policies via the Internet and any other means deemed appropriate by the applying entity. The applying entity’s policies at a minimum should contain appropriate confirmation of the receipt of the abuse report, the process of review of the report, and actions that will be taken if the applying entity confirms the report is legitimate. SC5.2-1.5 - The applying entity understands that DNS Abuse is Phishing, Malware, Botnets, Pharming and Spam (when used to deliver other forms of DNS Abuse). The applying entity understands and is prepared to contribute to the mitigation or disruption of DNS Abuse in domains in the TLD zone. SC5.2-1.6 - The applying entity’s abuse response capabilities are resourced appropriately to ensure a timely and adequate investigation and response to reports of DNS Abuse. This includes capabilities to receive and evaluate evidence of DNS Abuse in reports, and to take action to stop or disrupt the DNS Abuse. SC5.2-1.7 - The applying entity is prepared to conduct periodic scans of its zone to identify if domains are being used to perpetrate DNS Abuse, and to maintain statistical reports of the scans, the findings, and actions taken.

Réponse fournie sous forme de document. L'ICANN ne publie pas les pièces jointes.

Q121As per Section 3(d) of Specification 11 of the Base Registry Agreement, a registry operator of a “generic string” may not impose eligibility criteria for registering names in the TLD that limit registrations exclusively to a single person or entity and/or that person’s or entity’s “Affiliates” (as defined in Section 2.9(c) of the Registry Agreement). “Generic String” means a string consisting of a word or term that denominates or describes a general class of goods, services, groups, organizations or things, as opposed to distinguishing a specific brand of goods, services, groups, organizations or things from those of others. Confirm that the applied-for string is not a “generic string” in which the applying entity intends to limit registrations exclusively to a single person or entity.

As per Section 3(d) of Specification 11 of the Base Registry Agreement, a registry operator of a “generic string” may not impose eligibility criteria for registering names in the TLD that limit registrations exclusively to a single person or entity and/or that person’s or entity’s “Affiliates” (as defined in Section 2.9(c) of the Registry Agreement). “Generic String” means a string consisting of a word or term that denominates or describes a general class of goods, services, groups, organizations or things, as opposed to distinguishing a specific brand of goods, services, groups, organizations or things from those of others. Confirm that the applied-for string is not a “generic string” in which the applying entity intends to limit registrations exclusively to a single person or entity.

true

Q223By submitting this Application, the applying entity confirms that it is submitting this Application with a good faith (“bona fide”) intent to operate the gTLD for which it has applied, and that the applying entity has read and understands the provisions of Section 5.2.3.1 Prohibited Communications and Activities of the Applicant Guidebook regarding the New gTLD Program rules prohibiting certain communications and activities to prevent parties from privately resolving string contention among themselves.

By submitting this Application, the applying entity confirms that it is submitting this Application with a good faith (“bona fide”) intent to operate the gTLD for which it has applied, and that the applying entity has read and understands the provisions of Section 5.2.3.1 Prohibited Communications and Activities of the Applicant Guidebook regarding the New gTLD Program rules prohibiting certain communications and activities to prevent parties from privately resolving string contention among themselves.

true

Q224By submitting this Application, the applying entity confirms that it has read and understands the provisions of Section 5.2.3.1 Prohibited Communications and Activities of the Applicant Guidebook regarding the New gTLD Program rules prohibiting certain communications and activities to prevent parties from privately resolving string contention among themselves.

By submitting this Application, the applying entity confirms that it has read and understands the provisions of Section 5.2.3.1 Prohibited Communications and Activities of the Applicant Guidebook regarding the New gTLD Program rules prohibiting certain communications and activities to prevent parties from privately resolving string contention among themselves.

true