Candidatures / .max / NA2631T-T74369 · publié par l'ICANN le 7 octobre 2026 · instantané du 2026-10-08
.max
StandardActiveRegistry Services, LLC, US Q1·Q25
Contrôle ultime déclaré : GoDaddy Inc. Q108 · Fiche ICANN ↗
1. Existing Registry Operator and Affiliate of Registrars
2. Affiliated Registrars:
GoDaddy.com, LLC (IANA 146)
Bombora Technologies Pty Ltd (IANA 353)
Wild West Domains, LLC (IANA 440)
Blue Razor Domains, LLC (IANA 612)
Go China Domains, LLC (IANA 1149)
Go Canada Domains, LLC (IANA 1150)
Go Australia Domains, LLC (IANA 1151)
Go Montenegro Domains, LLC (IANA 1152)
Go France Domains, LLC (IANA 1153)
Mesh Digital Limited (IANA 1390)
123-Reg Limited (IANA 1515)
GoDaddy Online Services Cayman Islands Ltd (IANA 1659)
GoDaddy Corporate Domains, LLC (IANA 3786)
§ 1 — Sens de la chaîne Q118·Q120
"Max" is an informal shortening of "maximum" or "maximize," referring to the greatest possible amount, degree, or upper limit of something.
/mæks/
§ 2 — Mission et objet Q133
1. Describe the mission and purpose of the applied-for gTLD.
.max helps performance brands, premium product tiers, and value-driven retailers create a clear and memorable online presence for their strongest offering, making it easier for shoppers to instantly recognize the best or fullest version. In three confident letters, a name signals "the most" before a visitor even arrives.
Intended Registrants: Performance-oriented brands and product lines, fitness and athletic companies, pricing and value retailers, premium or upgrade tiers, and creators whose identity centers on peak results.
Intended Users: Consumers comparing products by top capability, shoppers seeking maximum value, fitness and wellness audiences, and visitors looking for a brand's highest offering.
Related Activities Supporting the Purpose:
• Awareness-building linking the namespace to peak performance and top-tier value.
• Registrar distribution for broad commercial and personal availability.
• Registrant education on naming patterns such as product.max or plan.max.
• Community outreach to retail, performance, and fitness segments.
• Responsible registry operations consistent with standard practice.
.max gives a name an immediate sense of scale. It signals the top of a range: the fullest version, the highest tier, the strongest result. That association is what makes it valuable as an online identity layer.
The purpose of .max is to give brands, products, and individuals a short, confident address that communicates "the most" before a visitor clicks. A retailer can point value.max at its best deals; a fitness label can turn power.max into a recognizable presence; a product line can mark its premium edition with a max-named address. The domain points to a destination and tells people what to expect there.
For registrants, the appeal is compression. Instead of stacking words like "best" or "ultimate" into a long address, a brand expresses superiority in three letters that read the same in every market, helping a product stand out online and stay easy to recall.
The namespace is intentionally focused. It is built for names where reaching the top of a category, a range, or a personal goal is the point, which distinguishes it from broad commercial extensions and from adjacent strings centered on discovery or trust.
2. Explain how this purpose is sustainable over time.
The durability of .max rests on a permanent feature of markets: buyers and sellers sort nearly everything into tiers, and the top tier is where margin, aspiration, and competition concentrate. Wherever options span a range, someone builds and sells the maximum version. Manufacturers ship a base model and a top model; retailers separate everyday value from best value; providers publish a standard plan and a highest plan. The line between "more" and "most" is how pricing and consumer choice function, not a passing trend.
"Max" is among the clearest, most portable ways to make that claim; it has already entered product naming across electronics, automotive, retail, and fitness because it compresses "the fullest version of this" into a syllable needing no translation. A naming layer built on that word inherits the same staying power.
Every product cycle yields a new top model; every promotion re-establishes a best offer; every subscription eventually adds a higher plan. These repeat on the cadence of commerce, and each repetition gives a brand fresh reason to name and point to its peak offering, so the concept refreshes rather than ages out.
§ 3 — Engagements et sauvegardes Q164–Q188
| Confiance accrue, risque pour le consommateur, secteur réglementé, déclarations à l'État, préjudice, fonction régalienne Q164–Q169 | Non à chacune |
|---|---|
| PIC de sauvegarde volontaires Q170·Q171 | Aucun · 90 candidatures de la ronde en proposent |
| Registry Voluntary Commitments Q172·Q173 | Aucun · 5 en proposent |
| Exemption du Code de conduite demandée Q185·Q188 | Non |
§ 4 — Toutes les autres réponses publiées
Toutes les autres réponses que l'ICANN a publiées pour cette candidature, dans l'ordre du formulaire. Les coordonnées (Q17–Q24) sont laissées à la fiche ICANN.
Q199Q2.2-1 - Provide the applying entity’s self-certification document, signed by the CEO, President, CFO, and/or equivalent officer of the applying entity. If financial statements are provided by a Qualified Parent Entity (QPE) of the applying entity, the CEO, President, CFO, and/or equivalent officer of the QPE must co-sign the certification document. The self-certification document must represent and warrant: SC2.2-1.1 - As of the submission date of the application, the applying entity is a current registry operator or an affiliated entity of a current registry operator with one or more active Registry Agreements (RA). SC2.2-1.2 - The applying entity and/or a QPE will fund the startup and long-term operation of all of the applying entity’s current gTLDs and applied-for gTLD strings. SC2.2-1.3 - The applying entity and/or its officers are bound by law in its jurisdiction to represent financial statements accurately and the applying entity is in good standing in that jurisdiction.
Q2.2-1 - Provide the applying entity’s self-certification document, signed by the CEO, President, CFO, and/or equivalent officer of the applying entity. If financial statements are provided by a Qualified Parent Entity (QPE) of the applying entity, the CEO, President, CFO, and/or equivalent officer of the QPE must co-sign the certification document. The self-certification document must represent and warrant: SC2.2-1.1 - As of the submission date of the application, the applying entity is a current registry operator or an affiliated entity of a current registry operator with one or more active Registry Agreements (RA). SC2.2-1.2 - The applying entity and/or a QPE will fund the startup and long-term operation of all of the applying entity’s current gTLDs and applied-for gTLD strings. SC2.2-1.3 - The applying entity and/or its officers are bound by law in its jurisdiction to represent financial statements accurately and the applying entity is in good standing in that jurisdiction.
Réponse fournie sous forme de document. L'ICANN ne publie pas les pièces jointes.
Q200Q2.3-1 - Provide a document with a list of all of the applying entity’s current gTLDs and a list of all gTLDs for entities affiliated with the applying entity (if applicable).
Q2.3-1 - Provide a document with a list of all of the applying entity’s current gTLDs and a list of all gTLDs for entities affiliated with the applying entity (if applicable).
Réponse fournie sous forme de document. L'ICANN ne publie pas les pièces jointes.
Q220Q5.1-1 - Provide the applying entity’s self-certification document, signed by the CEO, President, CFO and/or equivalent officer of the applying entity. The self-certification document must represent and warrant: SC5.1-1.1 - The applying entity will appropriately protect confidentiality of data and prevent unauthorized access to data and services. SC5.1-1.2 - The applying entity will maintain a mature, appropriately funded and staffed security program, following a recognized, modern security framework based on risk management (such as the ISO27000 series, COBIT, HITRUST CSF, legally required security frameworks, or equivalent). The security program must be in place prior to delegation, and exist through at least the period of the registry agreement. SC5.1-1.3 - The applying entity is aware of and has designed its systems and business to comply with the relevant privacy and security regulations for all countries in which it operates.
Q5.1-1 - Provide the applying entity’s self-certification document, signed by the CEO, President, CFO and/or equivalent officer of the applying entity. The self-certification document must represent and warrant: SC5.1-1.1 - The applying entity will appropriately protect confidentiality of data and prevent unauthorized access to data and services. SC5.1-1.2 - The applying entity will maintain a mature, appropriately funded and staffed security program, following a recognized, modern security framework based on risk management (such as the ISO27000 series, COBIT, HITRUST CSF, legally required security frameworks, or equivalent). The security program must be in place prior to delegation, and exist through at least the period of the registry agreement. SC5.1-1.3 - The applying entity is aware of and has designed its systems and business to comply with the relevant privacy and security regulations for all countries in which it operates.
Réponse fournie sous forme de document. L'ICANN ne publie pas les pièces jointes.
Q221Q5.2-1 - Provide the applying entity’s self-certification document, signed by the CEO, President, CFO and/or equivalent officer of the applying entity. The self-certification document must represent and warrant: SC5.2-1.1 - The applying entity will, no later than delegation of the Top Level Domain (TLD), establish a dedicated abuse point of contact responsible for addressing matters requiring expedited attention and providing a timely response to abuse complaints concerning any name registered in the TLD. SC5.2-1.2 - The applying entity will, no later than delegation of the TLD, establish, publish, and provide to ICANN the location of a mechanism for members of the public to submit reports of abuse in accordance with the current obligations of the Base RA and any Consensus Policies. SC5.2-1.3 - The applying entity has developed proposed measures for removal of orphan glue records for names removed from the zone when provided with evidence in written form that the glue is present in connection with malicious conduct (see Specification 6). SC5.2-1.4 - The applying entity has or will have at time of delegation, established policies for handling complaints regarding abuse. Such policies are to be maintained and posted publicly so that anyone can review the policies via the Internet and any other means deemed appropriate by the applying entity. The applying entity’s policies at a minimum should contain appropriate confirmation of the receipt of the abuse report, the process of review of the report, and actions that will be taken if the applying entity confirms the report is legitimate. SC5.2-1.5 - The applying entity understands that DNS Abuse is Phishing, Malware, Botnets, Pharming and Spam (when used to deliver other forms of DNS Abuse). The applying entity understands and is prepared to contribute to the mitigation or disruption of DNS Abuse in domains in the TLD zone. SC5.2-1.6 - The applying entity’s abuse response capabilities are resourced appropriately to ensure a timely and adequate investigation and response to reports of DNS Abuse. This includes capabilities to receive and evaluate evidence of DNS Abuse in reports, and to take action to stop or disrupt the DNS Abuse. SC5.2-1.7 - The applying entity is prepared to conduct periodic scans of its zone to identify if domains are being used to perpetrate DNS Abuse, and to maintain statistical reports of the scans, the findings, and actions taken.
Q5.2-1 - Provide the applying entity’s self-certification document, signed by the CEO, President, CFO and/or equivalent officer of the applying entity. The self-certification document must represent and warrant: SC5.2-1.1 - The applying entity will, no later than delegation of the Top Level Domain (TLD), establish a dedicated abuse point of contact responsible for addressing matters requiring expedited attention and providing a timely response to abuse complaints concerning any name registered in the TLD. SC5.2-1.2 - The applying entity will, no later than delegation of the TLD, establish, publish, and provide to ICANN the location of a mechanism for members of the public to submit reports of abuse in accordance with the current obligations of the Base RA and any Consensus Policies. SC5.2-1.3 - The applying entity has developed proposed measures for removal of orphan glue records for names removed from the zone when provided with evidence in written form that the glue is present in connection with malicious conduct (see Specification 6). SC5.2-1.4 - The applying entity has or will have at time of delegation, established policies for handling complaints regarding abuse. Such policies are to be maintained and posted publicly so that anyone can review the policies via the Internet and any other means deemed appropriate by the applying entity. The applying entity’s policies at a minimum should contain appropriate confirmation of the receipt of the abuse report, the process of review of the report, and actions that will be taken if the applying entity confirms the report is legitimate. SC5.2-1.5 - The applying entity understands that DNS Abuse is Phishing, Malware, Botnets, Pharming and Spam (when used to deliver other forms of DNS Abuse). The applying entity understands and is prepared to contribute to the mitigation or disruption of DNS Abuse in domains in the TLD zone. SC5.2-1.6 - The applying entity’s abuse response capabilities are resourced appropriately to ensure a timely and adequate investigation and response to reports of DNS Abuse. This includes capabilities to receive and evaluate evidence of DNS Abuse in reports, and to take action to stop or disrupt the DNS Abuse. SC5.2-1.7 - The applying entity is prepared to conduct periodic scans of its zone to identify if domains are being used to perpetrate DNS Abuse, and to maintain statistical reports of the scans, the findings, and actions taken.
Réponse fournie sous forme de document. L'ICANN ne publie pas les pièces jointes.
Q121As per Section 3(d) of Specification 11 of the Base Registry Agreement, a registry operator of a “generic string” may not impose eligibility criteria for registering names in the TLD that limit registrations exclusively to a single person or entity and/or that person’s or entity’s “Affiliates” (as defined in Section 2.9(c) of the Registry Agreement). “Generic String” means a string consisting of a word or term that denominates or describes a general class of goods, services, groups, organizations or things, as opposed to distinguishing a specific brand of goods, services, groups, organizations or things from those of others. Confirm that the applied-for string is not a “generic string” in which the applying entity intends to limit registrations exclusively to a single person or entity.
As per Section 3(d) of Specification 11 of the Base Registry Agreement, a registry operator of a “generic string” may not impose eligibility criteria for registering names in the TLD that limit registrations exclusively to a single person or entity and/or that person’s or entity’s “Affiliates” (as defined in Section 2.9(c) of the Registry Agreement). “Generic String” means a string consisting of a word or term that denominates or describes a general class of goods, services, groups, organizations or things, as opposed to distinguishing a specific brand of goods, services, groups, organizations or things from those of others. Confirm that the applied-for string is not a “generic string” in which the applying entity intends to limit registrations exclusively to a single person or entity.
true
Q223By submitting this Application, the applying entity confirms that it is submitting this Application with a good faith (“bona fide”) intent to operate the gTLD for which it has applied, and that the applying entity has read and understands the provisions of Section 5.2.3.1 Prohibited Communications and Activities of the Applicant Guidebook regarding the New gTLD Program rules prohibiting certain communications and activities to prevent parties from privately resolving string contention among themselves.
By submitting this Application, the applying entity confirms that it is submitting this Application with a good faith (“bona fide”) intent to operate the gTLD for which it has applied, and that the applying entity has read and understands the provisions of Section 5.2.3.1 Prohibited Communications and Activities of the Applicant Guidebook regarding the New gTLD Program rules prohibiting certain communications and activities to prevent parties from privately resolving string contention among themselves.
true
Q224By submitting this Application, the applying entity confirms that it has read and understands the provisions of Section 5.2.3.1 Prohibited Communications and Activities of the Applicant Guidebook regarding the New gTLD Program rules prohibiting certain communications and activities to prevent parties from privately resolving string contention among themselves.
By submitting this Application, the applying entity confirms that it has read and understands the provisions of Section 5.2.3.1 Prohibited Communications and Activities of the Applicant Guidebook regarding the New gTLD Program rules prohibiting certain communications and activities to prevent parties from privately resolving string contention among themselves.
true