Candidatures / .ulm / STG2615T-T27984 · publié par l'ICANN le 7 octobre 2026 · instantané du 2026-10-08
.ulm
GéographiqueActiveSWU TeleNet GmbH, DE Q1·Q25
Contrôle ultime déclaré : Stadt Ulm Q108 · Fiche ICANN ↗
§ 1 — Sens de la chaîne Q118·Q120
No English Translation
/ˈʊlm/
§ 2 — Mission et objet Q133
Mission & Purpose
The string "ulm" identifies one of Germany's historically significant cities, internationally recognized as the birthplace of Albert Einstein, former home to the tallest church steeple in the world, and a leading center of innovation, science, and technology in Baden-Württemberg.
The mission of the .ulm gTLD is to establish a dedicated, trusted, and geographically meaningful digital namespace for the city of Ulm, its metropolitan area (“Innovationsregion Ulm”) and its community. The TLD will provide an inclusive namespace encompassing its residents, businesses, cultural institutions, public authorities, and civic organizations.
The .ulm TLD is designed to serve as the authoritative digital home for everything and everyone genuinely connected to Ulm. The TLD provides a namespace that is immediately recognizable, locally anchored, and clearly distinct from generic alternatives such as .com, .de, or .org, none of which can convey the same geographic identity and community belonging that .ulm offers.
Intended Registrants & Users
The registrants will be mainly entities and individuals with a connection to the city of Ulm or the Ulm metropolitan region. This includes the City of Ulm, administrative bodies, local businesses, cultural and educational institutions such as Ulm University and Technische Hochschule Ulm, healthcare providers incl. Universitätsklinikum Ulm, civic associations, community groups, and individual residents wishing to express their local identity online. In addition, platforms and service providers supporting the Ulm community, such as regional event portals, and local media outlets are potential registrants, provided their registrations are consistent with the location-oriented character of .ulm.
Related Activities
To realize this mission, the registry will implement registration policies that preserve a strong connection to the Ulm region while remaining open to registrants. A Sunrise Period will protect existing trademark holders, followed by a phased General Availability launch. An Early Access Phase might be introduced to provide a privileged registration phase. Active outreach will be conducted in partnership with the City of Ulm, and local organizations. Early adoption by the city government itself will serve as a powerful anchor for public trust and awareness, like rathaus.ulm and buergerservice.ulm. Cultural flagships such as the Ulmer Münster and major events like Schwörmontag civic tradition are natural candidates for high-profile .ulm registrations that reinforce the TLD's local identity in the public consciousness.
Sustainability Over Time
The long-term sustainability of .ulm rests on structural foundations that are both geographic and civic in nature. Ulm is a constitutionally established German municipality (first mentioned in year 854) whose identity, governance, and community life are permanent. Ulm's status as a nationally recognized innovation hub, anchored by its university, the Science City Ulm initiative, and a strong cluster of technology and life sciences companies, ensures a growing and digitally active registrant base well into the future.
Financially, the registry will operate on a stable registration and renewal fee model, as successfully demonstrated by comparable city TLDs such as .berlin, .hamburg, and .koeln. A well-governed, clearly scoped namespace with a loyal and locally invested registrant community is structurally positioned for consistent renewal rates and low registrant churn.
The TLD .ulm will benefit from the accelerating digitization of local government, business, and civil society. As public services move online and civic identity increasingly manifests in digital spaces, the demand for a domain that instantly communicates "this is Ulm" will grow rather than diminish. The TLD's value to registrants increases as adoption deepens and create a self-reinforcing dynamic that sustains the namespace commercially and culturally well into the future.
§ 3 — Engagements et sauvegardes Q164–Q188
| Confiance accrue, risque pour le consommateur, secteur réglementé, déclarations à l'État, préjudice, fonction régalienne Q164–Q169 | Non à chacune |
|---|---|
| PIC de sauvegarde volontaires Q170·Q171 | Aucun · 90 candidatures de la ronde en proposent |
| Registry Voluntary Commitments Q172·Q173 | Aucun · 5 en proposent |
| Exemption du Code de conduite demandée Q185·Q188 | Non |
§ 4 — Toutes les autres réponses publiées
Toutes les autres réponses que l'ICANN a publiées pour cette candidature, dans l'ordre du formulaire. Les coordonnées (Q17–Q24) sont laissées à la fiche ICANN.
Q212Q4.2-1 - Provide the applying entity’s self-certification document, signed by the CEO, President, CFO and/or equivalent officer of the applying entity. If financial statements are provided by a Qualified Parent Entity (QPE), the CEO, President, CFO, and/or equivalent officer of the QPE must co-sign the certification document. The self-certification document must represent and warrant: SC4.2-1.1 - The applying entity and/or a QPE will fund the startup and long-term operation of all applied-for gTLD strings and (if applicable) currently operated gTLDs of a QPE. SC4.2-1.2 - The applying entity or QPE has at a minimum of US$50,000 plus 25% of the application base fee for each applied-for gTLD string in Cash and Cash Equivalents on the balance sheet of the provided financial statements, up to a maximum of US$300,000, designated to support the startup and operation of all of the applying entity’s applied-for gTLD strings. SC4.2-1.3 - The applying entity and/or its officers are bound by law in its jurisdiction to represent financial statements accurately and the applying entity is in good standing in that jurisdiction.
Q4.2-1 - Provide the applying entity’s self-certification document, signed by the CEO, President, CFO and/or equivalent officer of the applying entity. If financial statements are provided by a Qualified Parent Entity (QPE), the CEO, President, CFO, and/or equivalent officer of the QPE must co-sign the certification document. The self-certification document must represent and warrant: SC4.2-1.1 - The applying entity and/or a QPE will fund the startup and long-term operation of all applied-for gTLD strings and (if applicable) currently operated gTLDs of a QPE. SC4.2-1.2 - The applying entity or QPE has at a minimum of US$50,000 plus 25% of the application base fee for each applied-for gTLD string in Cash and Cash Equivalents on the balance sheet of the provided financial statements, up to a maximum of US$300,000, designated to support the startup and operation of all of the applying entity’s applied-for gTLD strings. SC4.2-1.3 - The applying entity and/or its officers are bound by law in its jurisdiction to represent financial statements accurately and the applying entity is in good standing in that jurisdiction.
Réponse fournie sous forme de document. L'ICANN ne publie pas les pièces jointes.
Q220Q5.1-1 - Provide the applying entity’s self-certification document, signed by the CEO, President, CFO and/or equivalent officer of the applying entity. The self-certification document must represent and warrant: SC5.1-1.1 - The applying entity will appropriately protect confidentiality of data and prevent unauthorized access to data and services. SC5.1-1.2 - The applying entity will maintain a mature, appropriately funded and staffed security program, following a recognized, modern security framework based on risk management (such as the ISO27000 series, COBIT, HITRUST CSF, legally required security frameworks, or equivalent). The security program must be in place prior to delegation, and exist through at least the period of the registry agreement. SC5.1-1.3 - The applying entity is aware of and has designed its systems and business to comply with the relevant privacy and security regulations for all countries in which it operates.
Q5.1-1 - Provide the applying entity’s self-certification document, signed by the CEO, President, CFO and/or equivalent officer of the applying entity. The self-certification document must represent and warrant: SC5.1-1.1 - The applying entity will appropriately protect confidentiality of data and prevent unauthorized access to data and services. SC5.1-1.2 - The applying entity will maintain a mature, appropriately funded and staffed security program, following a recognized, modern security framework based on risk management (such as the ISO27000 series, COBIT, HITRUST CSF, legally required security frameworks, or equivalent). The security program must be in place prior to delegation, and exist through at least the period of the registry agreement. SC5.1-1.3 - The applying entity is aware of and has designed its systems and business to comply with the relevant privacy and security regulations for all countries in which it operates.
Réponse fournie sous forme de document. L'ICANN ne publie pas les pièces jointes.
Q221Q5.2-1 - Provide the applying entity’s self-certification document, signed by the CEO, President, CFO and/or equivalent officer of the applying entity. The self-certification document must represent and warrant: SC5.2-1.1 - The applying entity will, no later than delegation of the Top Level Domain (TLD), establish a dedicated abuse point of contact responsible for addressing matters requiring expedited attention and providing a timely response to abuse complaints concerning any name registered in the TLD. SC5.2-1.2 - The applying entity will, no later than delegation of the TLD, establish, publish, and provide to ICANN the location of a mechanism for members of the public to submit reports of abuse in accordance with the current obligations of the Base RA and any Consensus Policies. SC5.2-1.3 - The applying entity has developed proposed measures for removal of orphan glue records for names removed from the zone when provided with evidence in written form that the glue is present in connection with malicious conduct (see Specification 6). SC5.2-1.4 - The applying entity has or will have at time of delegation, established policies for handling complaints regarding abuse. Such policies are to be maintained and posted publicly so that anyone can review the policies via the Internet and any other means deemed appropriate by the applying entity. The applying entity’s policies at a minimum should contain appropriate confirmation of the receipt of the abuse report, the process of review of the report, and actions that will be taken if the applying entity confirms the report is legitimate. SC5.2-1.5 - The applying entity understands that DNS Abuse is Phishing, Malware, Botnets, Pharming and Spam (when used to deliver other forms of DNS Abuse). The applying entity understands and is prepared to contribute to the mitigation or disruption of DNS Abuse in domains in the TLD zone. SC5.2-1.6 - The applying entity’s abuse response capabilities are resourced appropriately to ensure a timely and adequate investigation and response to reports of DNS Abuse. This includes capabilities to receive and evaluate evidence of DNS Abuse in reports, and to take action to stop or disrupt the DNS Abuse. SC5.2-1.7 - The applying entity is prepared to conduct periodic scans of its zone to identify if domains are being used to perpetrate DNS Abuse, and to maintain statistical reports of the scans, the findings, and actions taken.
Q5.2-1 - Provide the applying entity’s self-certification document, signed by the CEO, President, CFO and/or equivalent officer of the applying entity. The self-certification document must represent and warrant: SC5.2-1.1 - The applying entity will, no later than delegation of the Top Level Domain (TLD), establish a dedicated abuse point of contact responsible for addressing matters requiring expedited attention and providing a timely response to abuse complaints concerning any name registered in the TLD. SC5.2-1.2 - The applying entity will, no later than delegation of the TLD, establish, publish, and provide to ICANN the location of a mechanism for members of the public to submit reports of abuse in accordance with the current obligations of the Base RA and any Consensus Policies. SC5.2-1.3 - The applying entity has developed proposed measures for removal of orphan glue records for names removed from the zone when provided with evidence in written form that the glue is present in connection with malicious conduct (see Specification 6). SC5.2-1.4 - The applying entity has or will have at time of delegation, established policies for handling complaints regarding abuse. Such policies are to be maintained and posted publicly so that anyone can review the policies via the Internet and any other means deemed appropriate by the applying entity. The applying entity’s policies at a minimum should contain appropriate confirmation of the receipt of the abuse report, the process of review of the report, and actions that will be taken if the applying entity confirms the report is legitimate. SC5.2-1.5 - The applying entity understands that DNS Abuse is Phishing, Malware, Botnets, Pharming and Spam (when used to deliver other forms of DNS Abuse). The applying entity understands and is prepared to contribute to the mitigation or disruption of DNS Abuse in domains in the TLD zone. SC5.2-1.6 - The applying entity’s abuse response capabilities are resourced appropriately to ensure a timely and adequate investigation and response to reports of DNS Abuse. This includes capabilities to receive and evaluate evidence of DNS Abuse in reports, and to take action to stop or disrupt the DNS Abuse. SC5.2-1.7 - The applying entity is prepared to conduct periodic scans of its zone to identify if domains are being used to perpetrate DNS Abuse, and to maintain statistical reports of the scans, the findings, and actions taken.
Réponse fournie sous forme de document. L'ICANN ne publie pas les pièces jointes.
Q121As per Section 3(d) of Specification 11 of the Base Registry Agreement, a registry operator of a “generic string” may not impose eligibility criteria for registering names in the TLD that limit registrations exclusively to a single person or entity and/or that person’s or entity’s “Affiliates” (as defined in Section 2.9(c) of the Registry Agreement). “Generic String” means a string consisting of a word or term that denominates or describes a general class of goods, services, groups, organizations or things, as opposed to distinguishing a specific brand of goods, services, groups, organizations or things from those of others. Confirm that the applied-for string is not a “generic string” in which the applying entity intends to limit registrations exclusively to a single person or entity.
As per Section 3(d) of Specification 11 of the Base Registry Agreement, a registry operator of a “generic string” may not impose eligibility criteria for registering names in the TLD that limit registrations exclusively to a single person or entity and/or that person’s or entity’s “Affiliates” (as defined in Section 2.9(c) of the Registry Agreement). “Generic String” means a string consisting of a word or term that denominates or describes a general class of goods, services, groups, organizations or things, as opposed to distinguishing a specific brand of goods, services, groups, organizations or things from those of others. Confirm that the applied-for string is not a “generic string” in which the applying entity intends to limit registrations exclusively to a single person or entity.
true
Q159Is the applied-for string the name of a city and, if so, is the intention to use the TLD primarily for purposes associated with the city name?
Is the applied-for string the name of a city and, if so, is the intention to use the TLD primarily for purposes associated with the city name?
Yes
Q160If answered yes to previous question, how will the applying entity market and/or use the TLD primarily for purposes associated with the city name?
If answered yes to previous question, how will the applying entity market and/or use the TLD primarily for purposes associated with the city name?
Framework for German geoTLDs
Under the German Telecommunications Act (TKG), the administration of TLDs does not fall within the remit of the public Federal Network Agency (Bundesnetzagentur). The allocation and management of TLDs such as .de and .berlin are carried out independently and by private registry operators in Germany. For more than 30 years, registrants and Internet users have been accustomed to this model and would not assume that the registry operator is a public body.
Marketing and Use of .ulm
The .ulm TLD is designed to be the natural digital home for the city of Ulm, its metropolitan area and beyond. It’ is a clearly recognizable, geographically anchored namespace that gives businesses, institutions, residents, and civic organizations a way to signal their local roots instantly and authentically. Unlike generic alternatives such as .com or .de, a .ulm domain communicates not just what registrants do, but where they belong. The registry will anchor this promise in its generally open registration policies for registrants that are conneced to Ulm and its metropolitan region.
Marketing will pursue two complementary tracks. On the institutional side, the registry will work closely with the City of Ulm, the IHK Ulm, local media, and anchor institutions to seed the namespace early with high-visibility, high-credibility domains — so that from day one, .ulm is associated with recognized names that residents and visitors already trust. On the public-facing side, targeted campaigns will reach local businesses, associations, and residents directly, making the case that a .ulm domain is more than a web address: it is a statement of local identity, accountability, and community commitment.
Marketing channels might include but are not limited to digital advertising, social media, local print media, outdoor campaigns, and presence at regional trade fairs and business events. Crucially, the visual and narrative identity of Ulm — the silhouette of the Münster, the Einstein heritage, the Donau (Danube), the Schwörmontag tradition — will be woven into all campaign materials, creating an unmistakable link between the TLD and the city & region it represents.
Government and Public Administration
rathaus.ulm — the City of Ulm's central digital gateway for citizens
buergerservice.ulm — online access to municipal services and administrative processes
polizei.ulm — local police presence and public safety information
Tourism and City Promotion
visit.ulm — the city's official tourism and visitor information portal
einstein.ulm — celebrating the life and legacy of Ulm's most famous son
schwoermontag.ulm — Ulm's centuries-old civic oath ceremony and popular summer festival
Business and Commerce
handwerk.ulm — connecting local craftspeople with customers in the region
invest.ulm — a portal for companies considering locating or expanding in the Ulm area
ihk.ulm — the Chamber of Commerce
Education and Research
uni.ulm — the University of Ulm
sciencecity.ulm — the joint innovation campus bringing together university, research, and industry
studieren.ulm — a guide to studying and student life in Ulm
Culture, Sport, and Community
muenster.ulm — home of the world's tallest church steeple and its history
theater.ulm — Theater Ulm, the city's main stage for drama, opera, and dance
ssv.ulm — SSV Ulm 1846, the city's storied multi-sport club and football team
Personal Identity and Portfolios
bildwerk89.ulm — a local photographer presenting their portfolio to regional clients
sio-architekten.ulm — an architect rooted in the Ulm building tradition
physioplus.ulm — a physio office signalling local presence and trust
Community Groups, Clubs, and Associations
nachbarschaftshilfe-boefingen.ulm — a mutual aid network in the Böfingen neighbourhood
freie-kinder.ulm — a parent-led childcare group
reparaturcafe.ulm — a community space for repairing everyday items and reducing waste
Q158Is the applied-for string a geographic name as defined by it being any one of the following: a) the capital city name of a country or territory listed in the ISO 3166-1 standard; b) a city name, where it is clear from statements in the application that the applying entity intends to use the gTLD for purposes associated with the city name; c) a sub-national place name listed in the ISO 3166-2 standard; or d) Strings listed as UNESCO regions or appearing on the Geographic Regions section of the “Standard country or area codes for statistical use (M49)”
Is the applied-for string a geographic name as defined by it being any one of the following: a) the capital city name of a country or territory listed in the ISO 3166-1 standard; b) a city name, where it is clear from statements in the application that the applying entity intends to use the gTLD for purposes associated with the city name; c) a sub-national place name listed in the ISO 3166-2 standard; or d) Strings listed as UNESCO regions or appearing on the Geographic Regions section of the “Standard country or area codes for statistical use (M49)”
Yes
Q223By submitting this Application, the applying entity confirms that it is submitting this Application with a good faith (“bona fide”) intent to operate the gTLD for which it has applied, and that the applying entity has read and understands the provisions of Section 5.2.3.1 Prohibited Communications and Activities of the Applicant Guidebook regarding the New gTLD Program rules prohibiting certain communications and activities to prevent parties from privately resolving string contention among themselves.
By submitting this Application, the applying entity confirms that it is submitting this Application with a good faith (“bona fide”) intent to operate the gTLD for which it has applied, and that the applying entity has read and understands the provisions of Section 5.2.3.1 Prohibited Communications and Activities of the Applicant Guidebook regarding the New gTLD Program rules prohibiting certain communications and activities to prevent parties from privately resolving string contention among themselves.
true
Q224By submitting this Application, the applying entity confirms that it has read and understands the provisions of Section 5.2.3.1 Prohibited Communications and Activities of the Applicant Guidebook regarding the New gTLD Program rules prohibiting certain communications and activities to prevent parties from privately resolving string contention among themselves.
By submitting this Application, the applying entity confirms that it has read and understands the provisions of Section 5.2.3.1 Prohibited Communications and Activities of the Applicant Guidebook regarding the New gTLD Program rules prohibiting certain communications and activities to prevent parties from privately resolving string contention among themselves.
true